shot-button
E-paper E-paper
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai Crime News > Article > Badlapur encounter Advocate seeks court monitored probe in shootout

Badlapur encounter: Advocate seeks court-monitored probe in shootout

Updated on: 24 September,2024 11:26 AM IST  |  Mumbai
Vinod Kumar Menon | [email protected]

Sarode, an intervening advocate for one of the survivors of the Badlapur sexual assault case, clarified that he was not representing Akshay Shinde, the accused who was killed in a police shootout on Monday evening.

Badlapur encounter: Advocate seeks court-monitored probe in shootout

Security personnel stationed at the civic hospital in Kalwa after Akshay Shinde’s body was brought in following the shooting on Monday. PIC/Rajesh Gupta Pic/By Special Arrangement; (right) Akshay Shinde, the accused

"Everything is concocted and a false story is being presented. I will be moving an interim application before the Bombay High Court by afternoon demanding a court-monitored probe into the shootout," Advocate Asim Sarode told mid-day while speaking on the Badlapur encounter on September 24. Sarode, an intervening advocate for one of the survivors of the Badlapur sexual assault case, clarified that he was not representing Akshay Shinde, the accused who was killed in a police shootout on Monday evening. 


Sarode asserted, "As a human rights advocate, I have always condemned police custodial torture and extra-judicial killings. This case, too, raises many doubts."


Advocate Asim SarodeAdvocate Asim Sarode


"Akshay Shinde was accused in two separate cases and the matter was sub judice. As per my knowledge, both judges of the City Civil and Sessions court in Kalyan, who were hearing his case, were on leave on Monday. In that case, before whom was Akshay produced after police sought his transit remand and took custody from Taloja prison," he questioned. 

Sarode, while speaking on the Badlapur encounter, also questioned why other policemen present there did not overpower Akshay when he snatched the service revolver of a cop and started firing rounds. 

“Encounter ideology is criminal ideology, the supreme court has stated in (PUCL v/s Govt. of Maharashtra case) referenced 99 encounters and 135 deaths between 1995-997. Also in numerous other custodial death cases, the apex court has made serious observations,” added Advocate Sarode.

Badlapur sexual assault case: Victims justice was not a priority

Advocate Sarode also claimed that delivering justice to the two girls who were sexually abused by the accused was never a priority.  “The Badlapur school management has its close proximity to certain politicians and the image of the school was getting tarnished due to the public outcry and media attention, and yesterday’s incident, only corroborates that the image and reputation of those in power and the school was given priority than giving justice to the victim, by adhering to due process of criminal justice trial,” he said.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!

Register for FREE
to continue reading !

This is not a paywall.
However, your registration helps us understand your preferences better and enables us to provide insightful and credible journalism for all our readers.

Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK